Worship/Preaching

A Sermon for Passion Sunday or Holy Week

What Would We Have Done?

Before I get to the question that is the title of my message this morning,
I’d like for us to do a reality check.
You see, I believe that when it comes to the majority, if not all, of people in the story of Jesus’ passion and death,
they were merely acting according to form.
In other words,
they were just doing what they always do.

Take the religious folks in the gospels.
The scribes and Pharisees.
The leaders of the church, so to speak.
The Bishops, the District Superintendents, the pastors,
the members of church committees,
and the prominent laity who make sure the church runs as it should run –
smoothly and efficiently.
If there is one thing these folks don’t want,
it is someone who rocks the boat,
someone who threatens their positions of power and influence,
someone who calls them on their hypocrisy,
and Jesus is that someone to the extreme.

Jesus has confronted them time and again.
He has told them that they were more concerned with their own status than they were with the spiritual well-being of the people.
He has criticized their infatuation with temple and had driven their lackeys, the moneychangers, from that holy ground with a whip.
Jesus has even called them names like “you brood of vipers” and “white-washed tombs.”
In fact, Jesus has taken every opportunity possible to criticize their rules and regulations that keep the ordinary people from experiencing the fullness of God in their lives,
whether it is their onerous laws regarding the Sabbath,
or their sense of religious superiority over others.

It got so bad that Caiphas, the leader of the Sanhedrin, the governing body of the Jewish faith,
was led to proclaim,
It is better for one man to die, meaning Jesus of course, than it is for the nation, meaning our way of life, our positions and authority, to perish.
It’s easy to se why the religious folk acted as they did,
they were just doing what they always do.
They were acting out for their own preservation.

Then there’s the mob outside Pilate’s palace.
The people who got worked up into a frenzy and demanded Jesus’ death.
They were just acting like mobs from the beginning of time have acted.
Crying out for blood,
wanting to be entertained by the suffering of others,
and willing to do or say anything to get their way.
“We have no king but Caesar” they had shouted.
“His blood be on us and on our children,” they had screamed.
And later on,
they would gather round the cross,
mocking and taunting Jesus,
spitting at him,
and joking that is he really was the Son of God,
then why in the world didn’t he do something about his predicament.
Any divine being worth his salt could easily handle this situation,
and yet Jesus let them drive the nails in his hands and feet and raise him high on a cross for all the passing world to see.
So naturally the mob ridiculed Jesus.
Who could blame those people?

Take Pilate.
Pilate is a consummate politician,
He rules the land with a firm grasp on what he can and cannot do,
and what he can and cannot allow.
Expediency is word that governs his own life.
What is the expedient course of action to take is what he wants to know when faced with any situation.
And like any politician,
Pilate rarely makes a decision before checking to see which way the wind is blowing.
Further, like many politicians, Pilate lacks the courage necessary to act on his convictions.
So it is no surprise that he ultimately orders Jesus’ crucifixion.
Oh he doesn’t want to do it.
All the gospels speak of his reluctance to order the death of Jesus.
Even his wife comes and tells him she has had a bad dream about this Jesus, and warns him to have nothing to do with this Jewish Messiah,
but when push comes to shove,
Pilate follows the whims of the crowds,
Crucify him, they shouted.
Give us Barrabas, they demanded,
and so he does.
And yes, Pilate tries to wash his hands of the whole matter,
but, of course, no amount of soap and water can remove the blood from his hands.

That Pilate is merely doing what all politicians do is best seen in a conversation he has with Jesus in John’s gospel.
After the religious authorities have brought Jesus to him on charges of treason against Rome,
Pilate asks, “`Are you the King of the Jews?’
Jesus answers, `Do you ask this on your own,
or did others tell you about me?’
Pilate replied, `I am not a Jew, am I?
Your own nation and the chief priests have handed you over to me.
What have you done?’
To which Jesus said, `My kingdom is not from this world.
If my kingdom were from this world, my followers would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews.
But as it is, my kingdom is not from here.’
Pilate asked him, `So you are a king?’
Jesus answered, `You say that I am a king.
For this I was born, and for this I came into the world:
to testify to the truth.
Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice.’
Pilate asked him, `What is truth?’

For Pilate, truth is what you make it.
Truth is malleable, subject to change,
It is never fixed for people like Pilate,
and they conveniently make truth into what is most manageable and marketable for the moment.
Given what he is,
and who he is,
we really cannot expect any better of Pilate, can we?

And let’s not forget the soldiers who carried out their grizzly task.
What about them?
They were only following orders,
they would say.
But “only following orders” has led to one injustice after another since the beginning of time.
Jesus’ crucifixion . . .
The inquisition in Spain . . .
The trail of tears in America . . .
The holocaust in Germany . . .
And the list goes on and on.
The soldiers were only doing what they have always done.

But what about those who were close to Jesus?
How do we explain their actions?

There is Judas,
who betrays Jesus.
We don’t really know what his motivation for doing this was,
but we do know that he sold his friend out for 30 pieces of silver.
After spending all that time with him,
walking the same dusty trails and roads with him,
listening to Jesus speak and teach for months,
for Judas it comes down to this:
a bag of coins and a kiss of betrayal.
And the others?
What about Matthew and John, Andrew and Thomas and the rest of the gang, save Peter?
What do we make of them?
When Jesus is betrayed and arrested,
what do they do?
You know what they do.
They run like scared rabbits from the garden.
They flee the scene of the crime,
and, as far as we know, only one of them,
John, the youngest, has the courage to even show up at the cross.
Cowards they were.
Afraid that they too would find themselves hanging on a tree,
merely because they associated with this radical rabbi.

And then there’s Peter,
who denies even knowing Jesus.

Yes, out of all the disciples,
Peter was the only one to try to defend Jesus,
striking out with a sword,
and he was the only one to follow after Jesus when he was arrested.

Peter  even went as far as the courtyard of the High Priest’s house,
but when push came to shove,
when questioned about his association with a known criminal rabble-rouser,
when it came time for him to stand up for his friendship and his friend,
he bluntly declares for all to hear,
I do not know that man,”
And at the very moment he says this for the third time,
a rooster crows,
and Luke tells us that Jesus,
handcuffed and captive,
looked over at Peter,
and Peter seeing his friend,
ran out into the night, weeping bitter tears.

And that brings me to the title of my sermon this morning.
What would we have done?
If we had been there,
would things have turned out any differently?
To answer this and to end my sermon this morning,
I turn to the writings of Lois Cheney,
a nun, whose work I discovered almost 25 years ago,
and whose words still have the ability to haunt my thoughts.
She wrote:

The ancient Hebrews were so tied by tradition they couldn’t recognize the Messiah when he was right there in front of them,
and he was crucified.

The disciples, who walked and worked with the Christ,
were very afraid of him;
they hoped, but they also doubted,
and they ran that night,
and he was crucified.

The common people mobbed him,
showed him their sicknesses and sores,
and they threw down an aisle of palms for him and sang to him,
and he was crucified.

His family was embarrassed, and stood outside,
and wished he’d come home,
and he was crucified.

Would we crucify Jesus today?
It’s not a rhetorical question for the mind to play with.
I believe,
We are each born with a body, a mind, a soul, and a handful of nails.

I believe,
When a man dies, no one has ever found any nails left,
clutched in his hands
or stuffed in his pockets.

God is No Fool, Lois A. Cheney, Abingdon Press, 1969, pp. 40-41

Technorati Tags: ,
Categories: Holy Week, Worship/Preaching | Tags: , | 5 Comments

A Reflection on Naaman

Namaan The first reading fro this Sunday’s worship service is taken from 2 Kings 5:1-14 and concerns a mighty man named Naaman who is stricken with leprosy.  Because it also deals with a man with leprosy, the gospel provides a nice bookend for this lection, but I will deal with it in a later post,  maybe . . .

First the text itself:

Naaman, commander of the army of the king of Aram, was a great man and in high favor with his master, because by him the LORD had given victory to Aram. The man, though a mighty warrior, suffered from leprosy.

Now the Arameans on one of their raids had taken a young girl captive from the land of Israel, and she served Naaman’s wife. She said to her mistress, "If only my lord were with the prophet who is in Samaria! He would cure him of his leprosy."

So Naaman went in and told his lord just what the girl from the land of Israel had said. And the king of Aram said, "Go then, and I will send along a letter to the king of Israel." He went, taking with him ten talents of silver, six thousand shekels of gold, and ten sets of garments. He brought the letter to the king of Israel, which read, "When this letter reaches you, know that I have sent to you my servant Naaman, that you may cure him of his leprosy."

When the king of Israel read the letter, he tore his clothes and said, "Am I God, to give death or life, that this man sends word to me to cure a man of his leprosy? Just look and see how he is trying to pick a quarrel with me." But when Elisha the man of God heard that the king of Israel had torn his clothes, he sent a message to the king, "Why have you torn your clothes? Let him come to me, that he may learn that there is a prophet in Israel."

So Naaman came with his horses and chariots, and halted at the entrance of Elisha’s house. Elisha sent a messenger to him, saying, "Go, wash in the Jordan seven times, and your flesh shall be restored and you shall be clean." But Naaman became angry and went away, saying, "I thought that for me he would surely come out, and stand and call on the name of the LORD his God, and would wave his hand over the spot, and cure the leprosy! Are not Abana and Pharpar, the rivers of Damascus, better than all the waters of Israel? Could I not wash in them, and be clean?" He turned and went away in a rage.

But his servants approached and said to him, "Father, if the prophet had commanded you to do something difficult, would you not have done it? How much more, when all he said to you was, ‘Wash, and be clean’?" So he went down and immersed himself seven times in the Jordan, according to the word of the man of God; his flesh was restored like the flesh of a young boy, and he was clean.

Initially Naaman appears to be, as they say, “all that.”  He is an army commander, a great man, highly favored by his superior, a mighty warrior, and even more important, a victorious warrior.  What more could this man want or desire?  Well, his health, for one thing.  The litany of Naaman’s achievements and legacy ends with a three-word death sentence.  Naaman “suffered from leprosy.”

Without going into details about how leprosy in the Bible could mean any variety of skin diseases or ailments (and not necessarily what we call leprosy today – Hanson’s Disease), a diagnosis of leprosy almost always mean social isolation.  Naaman faced being ostracized from his friends and family, and would almost certainly face the loss of everything that seemingly made him who he was:  his power and might and success and favor in the eyes of others. 

Now I don’t know if you have ever faced such a prospect, but I can imagine that this was a traumatizing situation for Naaman to find himself in.  Think about it for a moment.  When people often define themselves by their jobs or occupations, how devastating it is for many when they lose this identification.  ‘What do you you do?” we ask others.  And in reply, people don’t say things like “I work as a baker,” or “I paint walls,” or “I spend my day assembling cars in a factory.”  No, people will reply, “I am a baker,”  “I am a painter,” and “I am a factory worker.”  Given this, what does one become when they no longer are what they used to do.  Part of the tragedy of this economic crisis is the loss of identity that comes along with the loss of a job.

The same is certainly true of Naaman.  He has, I am sure, spent his life rising through the military chain of command.  He has come to a place in his career where he is respected and favored.  People listen to him.  Even the king listens to him.  But now, all of this is threatened because of that one word:  leprosy.  Whatever power he has, whatever prestige he has, and whatever respect he has, will soon disappear as the ravages of this disease become more apparent. 

So what’s a man like Naaman to do?  And this is where the story gets interesting (at least in my opinion).   It is a slave girl who gives Naaman the only advice that will save him.  And on top of that, she is a slave girl from one of his raids against Israel itself.   This young girl, who is a nobody and who has all the reasons in the world to hate Naaman and wish him an early demise, offers him a lifeline.  That is some amazing grace right there, if you ask me.

Of course, Naaman, being who is, cannot just follow the young girl’s advice and seek out a lowly prophet.  No, he has to go and do things his way.  Bringing a treasure trove with him and a letter from his King to the King of Israel, he tries to maintain a semblance of importance and greatness, even though he is now (though he may not act like it) just another sick slob, just one more person about to be thrown on the dung heap, one more unwanted person – an outcast, in other words.

The letter and treasure accomplish nothing for Naaman, of course, though they do scare the King of Israel to death.  And it’s the King’s fear that finally brings the prophet Elisha into the story.  Now mind you, we never actually see Elisha in this passage. . . not here, nor when Naaman actually makes it to his home.  Elisha communicates by messenger, and this fact also infuriates Naaman, who clings to his illusions of grandeur.  “How dare this man not even come outside of his home to welcome me, to greet me!  Doesn’t he know who I am?  I am Naaman! I am a commander of the army of the king of Aram!  I am a great man, highly favored by my master, a mighty and victorious warrior!  Doesn’t this prophet know who am I?

And I can just imagine the prophet saying to himself, “Yes, Naaman, I know exactly who you are.  You, my friend are a leper.  And none of your titles, your pretentions, or your connections are going to help you right now.  You are a sick man, period.  And you need to be healed, period.  Nothing else matters,

But Naaman doesn’t get it, does he?  He keeps on with his rant. “I can’t believe this supposed prophet wants me to wash myself in the muddy little stream those Israelites call a river.  The Jordan River!  What a joke!  We have sewer drainage ditches bigger and cleaner than the Jordan back in my home country.  If that so-called prophet thinks I am gonna to wash myself in the Jordan even once, let alone seven times, he has another think coming.  Let’s go, b
oys!  This was a huge waste of time.”

And it is the nobodies in the story that save his skin again, literally and figuratively.  “But his servants approached and said to him, ‘Father, if the prophet had commanded you to do something difficult, would you not have done it? How much more, when all he said to you was, ‘Wash, and be clean’?’"  And even though he is probably not through with his huffing and puffing, Naaman does listen to them, and lo and behold, he is cleansed of his disease.

A couple of things stand out for me about this story.  One, as previously hinted at, the “nobodies” in this story play central roles.  These supposed “little people” are the ones who actually put the whole healing story in motion and keep it moving until its conclusion.  Without the slaves/servants in this tale, Naaman becomes one of the untouchables and dies from a dreadful and painful disease.  Listening to those without power can sometimes be the best thing that those in power can ever do.

Second, Naaman has to learn to let go of his self-image of himself. He must deign to let go of his pride and become humble enough to do things he would never otherwise do.  He is no longer a army commander or person of importance, instead he is a man who is sick, perhaps unto death, and he needs healing.  This is, of course, where we all find ourselves after we strip away our titles and pretensions.  We are, all of us, sinners in need of saving.  We are, all of us, sick and diseased, and in need of healing.  We are, in other words, human, and need to approach God for help just as we are.

As the old hymn of the faith puts it:

Just as I am, without one plea,
But that Thy blood was shed for me,
And that Thou bidd’st me come to Thee,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.

Just as I am, and waiting not
To rid my soul of one dark blot,
To Thee whose blood can cleanse each spot,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.

Just as I am, tho’ tossed about
With many a conflict, many a doubt,
Fightings and fears within, without,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.

Just as I am, poor, wretched, blind-
Sight, riches, healing of the mind,
Yea, all I need in Thee to find-
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.

Just as I am, Thou wilt receive,
Wilt welcome, pardon, cleanse, relieve,
Because Thy promise I believe,
O Lamb of God, I come! I come!

Categories: Bible Study, Preaching, Worship/Preaching | Leave a comment

Reflection on the Lectionary: Choosing What Is Best

The Gospel for this Sunday (July 22, 2007) is Luke 10:38-42:

Now as they went on their way, Jesus entered a certain village, where a woman named Martha welcomed him as a guest into her home. She had a sister named Mary, who sat down beside Jesus’ feet and listened to what he was saying.  But Martha was driven to distraction by much serving; so she came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, don’t you care that my sister has left me to do all the work by myself? Tell her then to help me.” But the Lord answered her, “Martha, Martha, you are anxious and disturbed by many things, but only one thing is necessary.  Mary has chosen what is best, and it will not be taken away from her.”  (My paraphrase)

The first thing to say about this passage is that it is not about elevating the contemplative lifestyle above a more action or work-oriented one.  After all, this brief scene takes place immediately after Jesus has told the oft mis-named parable of “The Good Samaritan.”  And you know how it ends, right?  “Go, and do likewise,” Jesus tells the scholar of the law and us.  Go and do.

The problem with Martha is not her work ethic.  Instead, the problem has to do with the many distractions she allows into her heart and her home, along with Jesus.  Martha becomes so preoccupied with her duties as the hostess that she all but forgets about her guest.  As Jesus tells her, “You are anxious and disturbed by many things.”

How often can the same thing be said of us?  I know that for me all of the activities of ministry and pastoring can, at times, interfere with me spending time at the foot of Jesus.  I can, and I bet the same is true for many followers of Jesus, become so worked up and busy with the job description of discipleship – checking off items on my to-do list, and otherwise running around trying to earn my Lord’s and my congregation’s praise and acceptance – that I find myself neglecting what should be the primary relationship in my life.  I forget the one thing that is necessary for me to remember at all times, and instead of choosing the best, I merely settle for the good.

So what is the one thing necessary?  Some may say that this “one thing” would vary from person to person.  That it is relative or situational in nature.  I, however, don’t think this.  To me, the one thing necessary is to recognize the presence of Jesus in my life and to cultivate my relationship with Jesus at all times and places.  Of course, this is a tall order, and I almost never am able to fill it.  Nevertheless, that is the one thing necessary.  That is why Mary is where she is in this story.  She is with Jesus.

In the same way, it can be said that the “Good Samaritan” was “with Jesus” as well when he saw and had mercy on the man who fell among thieves.  It’s not about whether one is doing or contemplating, it’s all about being in the kind of relationship with Jesus that makes me constantly on the lookout for ways I can encounter him.  This can happen in prayer, in Bible study, in worship; but it can also occur when I am going about my business (or should I say, “My Father’s business”) and reach out in love or compassion or mercy or forgiveness to another in his or her needs.

When Jesus says in Matthew’s gospel ”Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these, you did it to me.” (Matthew 25:40), he is elaborating on what it means to choose the best in those verses just as much as he does in this passage from Luke.

Jesus says there is “one thing that is necessary.”  He then adds that “Mary has chosen what is best.”  And to put is simply, what he means is that Martha is focusing on too many things and on the wrong things.

Some of you may remember the movie City Slickers. About mid-way through the film, Curly, played by Jack Palance, is riding next to Mitch, played by Billy Crystal.  Mitch and two of his New York buddies have come to northern New Mexico to work through their mutual mid-life crises by driving cattle up to Colorado.  But Curly can only shake his head at their anxieties and worries.

“You city folk!  You spend 50 weeks a year getting knots in your rope,” Curly uncomprehendingly observes. “Then you think two weeks up here will straighten it out.”

The horses pause beneath them.

“Do you know what the secret of life is?” Curly asks Mitch.

“No, what?” Mitch asks eagerly.

“This,” Curly answers holding up one gloved index finger.

“Your finger?” Mitch asks, thrown off a little.

“One thing,” Curly answers. “It is just one thing. You stick to this and anything else don’t mean beans.”

“That’s great,” Mitch enthuses, “but what’s the one thing?”

“That is what you got to figure out,” Curly cryptically responds before riding away.

Unlike Mitch, we followers of Jesus know what that one thing is.  We know that it is to seek and to dwell in Jesus’ presence, whether we are literally or figuratively sitting at his feet or whether we are tending to the sick and wounded and dying folks we encounter along the way.  It is all the same.

Categories: Luke, Reflection, Worship/Preaching | Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Adventure Journal by Contexture International.